The pending changes stuff should probably be restarted in a new thread (or the subject line changed, whichever is best). I've never been clear, though, how 'recent changes' works, let alone pending changes. Take a recent edit I reverted:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Madeleine_Astor&diff=prev&...
Some would revert or undo that without a second thought. I thought for a bit longer and sort of realised what was meant by the edit, but still couldn't be bothered to engage with the (IP) editor who made that edit, so reverted it with a half-explanation. Others would do different things. Some would see potential there for explaining to an IP editor how to edit, other would hit rollback. If it was a named account, and not an IP editor, I vaguely remember there are some welcome templates that can be used.
So my question is: how would an edit like that have been handled under pending changes? Most likely rejected due to being mis-spelt and no source provided, but where is the line drawn?
Carcharoth