On 1/25/07, Omegatron omegatron+wikienl@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/25/07, Matt R matt_crypto@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The same holds for RS and CITE: they don't magically guarantee quality
by
themselves, but they are great tools for doing so if not abused.
But they are only used for abuse. A simple sentence or two in WP:V and a dose of consensus is sufficient.
That's simply not true. I use them to show people how sources are important to show information is accurate. Citing reliable sources is the only way to show readers the content of an article is accurate and accuracy should be our primary concern. If you know of other ways to verify content, I'm all ears.
Mgm