That's a good one. One of the points of expedited cleanup should be : do we want the original contributor to return and edit again in the future? Will they be upset to find the article has moved or disappeared? How can we make them feel welcome in the community while critiquing and changing their work? which is one of the important aspects of review that gets lost in many AfD processes.
To your next post: agreed that this shouldn't be bureaucratic; just an implementation of polite interactions and good faith to improve and lend better context to deletion discussions.
SJ
On 7/14/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:55:51 +0100, "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Brilliant!
And one of the outcomes should be: expedited cleanup. If not performed, it can be stubbed or deleted after a week.
Guy (JzG)
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l