On 5/6/07, cohesion cohesion@sleepyhead.org wrote:
Yeah, this is a gray area.
No it isn't. The logo is not under a free licence thus it can only be used where a fair use case can be made and only in the article name space.
I would like to see some policy saying that the logo can be used for any reason as long as it falls within the functioning of wikipedia, but as I am not the copyright holder... :)
I fail to see any reason to encourage increased use of non free content.