Anthony DiPierro wrote:
On 12/8/05, Justin Cormack justin@specialbusservice.com wrote:
On 8 Dec 2005, at 11:28, Anthony DiPierro wrote:
But it's wrong to point out that most people on this list don't live in the UK, and therefore don't care about UK libel law?
Actually (ignoring the rest of this thread), UK libel law is probably the most important in the world, mainly because it is so bad and you can choose your jurisdiction. Cases have been heard where Americans sue Americans about libels in US publications just because a few copies reached the UK. For many years the UK was the only place any major libel cases were heard (in the days of [[Peter Carter-Ruck]]), as you could get serious damages and it was very much slanted in your favour. It has changed a bit now. The main thing was you didnt have to prove damages, unlike in the US; you would get a notional (often large but once famously a penny) amount of damages for loss of reputation.
Justinc
I think I'll wait to worry about this until I have a big enough presense in the UK that a ruling against me would matter. The UK can't garnish wages from my US employer, can they?
(Actually, at the point where I have significant assets in the UK I'll be able to afford a lawyer to research these issues for me. I certainly won't ask around on an international mailing list which has pretty much nothing to do with law.)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is the mailing list for the english Wikipedia, yes? So the point of asking is to try to work out what the policy is on that Wikipedia regarding libel. Great, you personally aren't affected. Does that absolve you of responsibility in attempting to formulate an understanding of the position to those it does affect and also to try and develop a policy on the situation? If you personally are unaffected, I'm very happy for you. Perhaps you could be sympathetic and at least understand the concerns of those that may be.