David Goodman wrote:
Screamer, you seem to have confused a number of things. The assertion of notability requirement for does not apply specifically to BLPs--it applies to any articles about people or some kinds of groups or web content that do not assert or indicate some plausible notability or importance. Meeting it does not provide that the article be kept, it just provides that it not be speedily deleted as obviously impossible altogether. It can further be contested by anyone except the author. It's just a shortcut requirement to get things quickly deleted that do not warrant a discussion.
What you are probably thinking of is the provision for summary deletion of BLPs as "Any administrator, acting on their own judgment, may delete an article that is substantially a biography of a living person if they believe that it (and every previous version of it) significantly violates any aspect of the relevant policy. " as enacted by arb com at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Badlydrawnje...
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Screamer scream@datascreamer.com wrote:
I'm not confused, I was only giving you a very specific example. I contested nothing you just stated.
So... how do you address my examples in regards to your earlier argument? since we got off topic.
./scream