Quoting James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com:
On 15/11/2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:30:27 +0000, "James Farrar" james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
Having an article because they hate us is no better than not having one because they hate us.
[[Daniel Brandt]], for instance...
(OK, technically we don't have an article on him not because he hates us, /per se/, but because after 14 AFDs reasonable people got bored with the circus and threw in the towel.)
Got good, non-trivial biographical sources about Brandt? I know where to find deletion review.
Brandt's article was deleted for lack of sources.
...that suddenly became an issue after 13 AFDs. Right. Whatever you say, Guy.
That wasn't what the summary said for the deletion reason, nor was it was closed in the DRV. Brandt was deleted under the new BLP clause (although not really deleted, all the content got moved elsewhere). This was despite, not due to sourcing.