Tony Sidaway wrote:
Christiaan Briggs said:
Well you'll have to excuse me, you seem clear enough of mind not to have missed this: as we discussed image holders could be used in the same way as using your browser to defer image downloads. The difference would be that only some of the images would be deferred instead of all of them.
It seems to me that which images are to be deferred would be decided by someone other than the reader. This would probably compromise NPOV.
To use a browser as you suggest defers ALL images. This way defers some images. And in either case the user is in control as which images are then loaded. Please Tony, I beg of you, why are you talking in circles?
Christiaan