ScottL wrote:
I tend to agree with your assessment here, I think. Though I would add that some of these lists are more appropriate in that their grouping together has some encyclopedic value when related to some other topic. This is not something a (traditional) dictionary could do. Terms specific to a subject that we have an article on especially when they are used in non-standard ways should be documented (if possible in the article in question. If the list gets too long like any other subsection it should be broken off.
I think the guideline should be more related to "would moving this to wikitionary result in some sort of loss of value". If it would not then move.
This would be a good succinct guideline.
Ec