Jussi-Ville Heiskanen a écrit:
Ok, Maybe you want them to be able to impose short bans, protect pages...Yup. For starters..
What?Anything that will give timely relief, but will not be so heavy as to be considered a serious sanction which previously would have been the sole prerogative of Jimbo. Basically anything that won't cause the general editorship or your operation to cry foul.
J-V Heiskanen
Another suggestion...
In a mediation that took place early on, a mediator asked information about ip number of two people. He did not mean to have these publicly disclosed, but having that information apparently would have been great help for him to settle a few points in the mediation process.
He asked twice the mailing list, and never got any answer. He finally had to ask Jimbo for help By the time a developer was here and available and willing to help, the information was no more recoverable (so I understood).
I will cite some words by Jussi
Are there technical facilities besides the bulletin board that we could and should have at our disposal?
Or are there justifieable fears of misuse? Should there be a non-mediator (an arbitrator perhaps) specifically tasked with providing special technical assistance for mediators?
What do you think ?