OK. What seems a practical first move?
Deleting all living bios is not going to fly. It just won't be accepted.
The layer of barely-notable bios could be vanquished with little trouble. The tricky part is "what is notable?" It's not going to be possible to come up with a hardline definition that doesn't result in gross systemic bias, editors deleting like deranged robots or both.
Is a new deletion rule on living bios worth trying? It's the most politically viable idea I've heard so far.
- d.