On 6/13/06, Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net wrote:
I'm afraid he is a notable figure. We should not have some kind of hatchet job on him, but someone who has engaged in all the public activity he has is certain deserving of a Wikipedia article. Of course, he is not a terrorist in the sense Timothy McVeigh was; he is just a critic. He makes a point now and then, but from the perspective of users whose privacy is at risk he is more of a destructive vandal. His point about anonymous people wielding power has some traction, but I notice that folks who edit under their own name receive more or less the same treatment as people who use pseudonyms.
Er, apart from having been a bit of a prune with respect to a certain, well-known encyclopaedia site, what has he done that is notable? How is he different to any other public nuisance? Has he featured in any print newspaper articles? Surely we don't have articles on anyone who has ever stalked anyone?
Steve