Robert stated for the record:
Sean writes:
I am very worried that we are seriously discussing the formation of a committee empowered to prohibit unpopular content from Wikipedia and to ban those that feel that it is important to record it.
Isn't that a deliberate lie? What facts (written in NPOV format) did Larry Sanger try to censor? What facts (written in NPOV format) did Steve Rubenstein try to censor? NONE.
I strongly object to this strawman attack - which borders on an ad homenim attack - on the discussion of improving Wikipedia.
Good tactic: when you can't answer the point, call the person making it a liar.
I am not lying when I say I am worried. I am worried about people who want to set up committees to decide what points of view will not be allowed to be represented in Wikipedia. When RK states that I am lying about being worried, he is ... guess what?