Andrew Gray wrote:
Doesn't require "stable versions", even, just a clearer segregation of drafts and published articles. 'Course, how we keep it up to date is a good question...
Since stable versions appears to finally be on the verge of actually being implemented, how about waiting to see what we can do with that first? It'd be much easier to transfer articles back and forth between "dev" and "live" branches if all that needed to be done was to fiddle with flags in the revision history.