charles matthews wrote:
"Stephen Bain" wrote
I'm sure they have real concerns, and I'm also sure that there are probably more errors in WP than in EB. The point is that WP can fix its errors far more quickly than traditional encyclopaedias, and we should use this opportunity to show that.
It would be cool to manoeuvre EB into fact-checking our articles. With enough EBs, any error is shallow, to coin a phrase.
Hrm...
How about a bounty system for errors? Provided you can back up your claim, you get some reward...