On 15/12/2007, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/12/2007, Casey Brown cbrown1023.ml@gmail.com wrote:
It's been fixed, it was caused by vandalism to this template: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Mojo_title which put the "Image:Vagina-anatomy1" at the top of all pages with that template. The template in question is now protected and the user blocked.
Mmm. I pre-emptively blocked a second template, too.
I wonder if it might be worth reminding the mailing-list about transcluded template vandalism and the importance of protecting heavily used templates...
...for what it's worth, we have over a thousand templates transcluded more than 2,800 times - even allowing for duplication and for some not being "reader-facing", that's still a heck of a lot. Is there any reason I shouldn't roll through protecting the high-use ones?