On 6/10/07, David Mestel david.mestel@gmail.com wrote:
The Cunctator wrote:
Of course, section 4 (Modifications) only applies to modified versions of the Document. We interpret it that its conditions apply to the original Document as well, but such requirements are not actually required by the GFDL.
Except that the Document is presumably modified by removing the history section.
That requires a pretty twisted definition of "the Document", though, consisting of multiple dynamically generated pages. Might as well make the definition even more twisted and include information that's still in the database but isn't available to non-admins. Or would that trigger the DRM clause?
Trying to apply the GFDL to Wikipedia is humorous sometimes...