As for the {{sofixit}} - in the associated podcast the author of the article called on scientists to do just that - find the articles that apply to their area of interest, and work to improve them.
One other thing - there's a subsection entitled 'Challenges of being a Wikipedian' which talks about WMC and his arbcomm cases.
Ian
On 12/14/05, Steve Bennett wiki@stevage.com wrote:
I also expect that, once the complete list of evaluated articles is
published by Nature, we will find that our articles are >longer, so that the error rate *per sentence* might very well be lower in Wikipedia.
A few people seem to have missed this from the website: "All entries were chosen to be approximately the same length in both encyclopaedias. In a small number of cases some material, such as reference lists, was removed to make the lengths of the entries more similar."
Steve
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l