On 10/7/06, daniwo59@aol.com daniwo59@aol.com wrote:
[...] But not everything in the Voice (or even in the NY Times for that matter) deserves an article. Editing isn't only about knowing what to add, but about knowing what not to add as well.
WP:NOT censored.
It's not particularly suprising that searches through mainstream press don't catch many sex-related brand names. Most sex-related products don't show up in mainstream press.
Despite that, sex related topics are a major economic field, including media, birth control and "safe sex" stuff, and other topics including sex toys.
Pursuant to that, WP has generally tasteful and encyclopedic articles on related topics.
Do you not believe those of us who are saying that Fleshlight is very well known if not notorious within the field?
Do you have a reason for opposing this that is not general uncomfortableness with having the topic in Wikipedia?