So what? Does that mean we need to allow a person to repeatedly vandalize Wikipedia? Have you even checked out this person's edits at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=... Are we just supposed to let them go ahead and troll for as long as they want to?
If they had even bothered to make ONE useful edit, they might have had an argument for not being blocked. His/he very first edit was to the Vandalism in progress page, in which he/she tried to support their vandalism as an anon. Things went downhill from there.
RickK
Jens Ropers ropers@ropersonline.com wrote: Based on the name and conduct, I dare say Ute is probably female and (possibly quite) young. Maybe that could be asked about and/or taken into account? Just a thought.
-- ropers [[en:User:Ropers]] www.ropersonline.com
On 16 Oct 2004, at 04:17, Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales wrote:
Polytarp! wrote:
Seeing as people have derided to trivialize my complaints instead of acting upon them, I have remanifestestinied my account under the CLEVER name "U Tworonto." It's pronounced the same way, but it's spelled such as to include the fact that it's the SECOND in a series!
Isn't that just absolutely clever?!
Brilliant. Blocked. Lucky you! You annoyed Jimbo himself. I haven't personally blocked anyone in a long time. I don't even know what the rules are about it! And I don't care! :-)
Now, if you want to relax and talk about something sensible, feel free.
--Jimbo
p.s. Yes, due process, blah blah blah. He's feel to appeal his ban to, uh, anyone actually. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!