On Wednesday 27 October 2004 03:24, Delirium wrote:
it's natural that your ideas will be treated more skeptically than those of someone who is demostrably familiar with the community
Hi,
I think it would be a good idea if people could examine ideas and decide on their usefulness without considering who proposed these ideas.
Consider for example that it is possible that a well-known community member may say something wrong and a newcomer can say something useful.
So, although some people may be somewhat sceptical seeing a non-familiar name in their To: headers, they should examine the ideas and not the poster; or at least this is my opinion.