Lee Pilich wrote:
As I say, possible duplication of effort in expanding the info in the future. Person X comes along to the UCB page, thinks, "Oh, Cory Hall, I can write a bit more about that" and does so. Person Y comes along to [[Cory Hall]], and writes a bit more there.
Is this really all that likely if the UCB article links to the Cory Hall article in the appropriate place?
I mean, I'm not sure I'd agree with that reasoning in this particular case, but it's reasoning that quite a lot of people have used, and it does make a certain sense.
Fair enough! I think that in this caes, that reasoning isn't very helpful, but I do concede that it is one possible cost of stub articles, particularly stub articles that aren't well-linked.
--Jimbo