On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:25:39 +0200, "Steve Bennett" stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me, with my fairly imprecise data, that anonymous editors are barred from editing a greater portion of articles than they could a year ago. It's not a significant portion, but it's growing.
The missing piece of data is: what proportion of anonymous editors are good contributors? If it's very small, then it's a non-issue.
Guy (JzG)