On 11/29/07, Mark Ryan ultrablue@gmail.com wrote:
What I would like to know (and I'm not going to bother digging through hundreds of emails on this topic to see if it's already been asked) is which arbitrators are members of that private/secret mailing list, and if some arbitrators are members of that list or, further, participated in discussions, then which of those arbitrators have recused themselves from this case.
If I am correct (somebody speak up if I'm not) I believe both Flonight and Morven are confirmed to have participated in both secret lists (cyberstalking and investigations). They therefore would have received Durova's evidence posted to cyberstalking, but merely receiving the email is not proof of having read it. Morven has said he did not participate in any discussions of it.
Despite participating in the lists and receiving the "evidence" email, no arbiter has agreed yet agreed to recuse themselves. Flonight and Morven are currently the deciding votes in a split-decision at the Arbcom case proposing to ban Giano for 90 days for revealing the evidence that exonerated !!.
Alec