Two questions:
1) What are you plans regarding incorporating content from other projects? There is a good chance that Wikipedia will soon switch to a license compatible with yours, so you could copy content across. Do you plan to do so, and to what extent?
2) Your "About" page says:
"Other projects have attempted, and continue to attempt, to develop free Internet encyclopedias—Wikipedia, Citizendium, Conservapedia, Open-Site, Scholarpedia, Veropedia, and Wikinfo, to name a few—yet have failed to produce reliable content, to attract a broad, diverse, responsible, and democratic community, or to achieve widespread public support."
I dispute that. Studies have shown that Wikipedia is as reliable as conventional encyclopaedias, the wide range of subjects covered in great depths shows we have a broad and diverse community, I haven't seen anything to suggest the Wikipedia community is irresponsible, and we don't try to be democratic so you're making a massive assumption there that democracy is the best way to run such a project. As for widespread public support, millions of dollars of donations over the past couple of months suggests we don't have a problem there. So which of those aspects are you suggesting Wikipedia has failed in?