I don't understand Fred Bauder personal attacks on me or his bizzare logic.
Fred Bauder quotes from Israel Shahak's obituary in the Guardian, and claims that this "puts the lie to your false accusations, Robert.
I read the quote he included, and nothing in it denied that quotes from Israel Shahak's book; nothing it denied the existence of the point of view of the Anti-Defamation League, and nothing in it denied the existence of the point of view of most Jews.
I honestly don't know what Fred imagines he sees there, but the words he quotes have nothing to do with what I was talking about.
A few people here still misunderstand what NPOV means. Zero and Fred think that they can do their own original research on a person, and present their own personal conclusions as "NPOV" facts. Sorry, but that is not how it works. Rather, in our encyclopedia we give the view of a person (especially on the subjects they are most well known for). We also give opposing points of view, and allow these other POVs equal weight.
Fred seems to have read these two sentences in an obituary, read nothing else, and then decided for himself that this somehow neutralizes the points of view of all other people and groups. That's not so. In fact, the text he quotes didn't mention the issue of dispute at all.
The issue stands.
Robert
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail