On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:26:56 +0200 "Steve Bennett" stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/15/06, stevertigo vertigosteve@yahoo.com wrote:
Somebody mentioned Wikinfo, which IIRC splits its articles according different general points of view. That's at least workable and in extreme cases might resemble our /draft method, but ultimately the goal is integration according to NPOV.
I think the quality of two separate articles written by anti-circumcisionists and pro-circumcisionists would be a hell of a lot worse than a single article fought over by both groups. At least we force them to engage with each other and find a tiny bit of common ground.
Disagree. An article is an argument (a presentation thereof) and two people editing the same article is like two people talking at the same time, never letting the other ever talk.
With two separate articles, there is of course still interaction - but now, the two people are trying to outdo each other who has the better article. Think about THAT.