Brock Weller wrote:
Trivia sections are not encyclopedic. We require non-trivial sources, and we shouldnt be one ourselves. If they dont fit elsewhere then they are rightly dropped.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. Often the random bits of information that appear in a "trivia" section are things that will _eventually_ fit into a better-structured article, but if the article isn't developed enough yet they may not fit _right now._
Declaring trivia sections to be "Bad" and deleting them out of hand is likely to throw away raw material that would be useful in a more finished article.
You can thank us for the usable encyclopedia later when you figure it out.
Deleting something that's currently incomplete doesn't increase the encyclopedia's overall completeness.