Raphael Wegmann schreef:
Eugene van der Pijll schrieb:
Raphael Wegmann schreef:
Why demand a fork, if we could easily avoid it?
I'm not demanding a fork, I'm suggesting one.
And why not?
I asked first. Why are you suggesting a fork, if we could easily avoid it?
Because that would make *them* happy, as they would have an encyclopedia without those images in it, and it would make *us* happy, because we can make the best encyclopedia we can, without having to compomise the content.
Now you: why not?
The same mechanism could certainly be used to filter inappropriate content for children as well.
I'd be unhappy about that as well.
Why don't you want to offer our children a WP suitable for kids?
Because I want an encyclopedia that is as good as possible for *me*, and I am not a kid. Having to filter content will either have a detrimental effect on that ideal encyclopedia, or it will have no effect, in which case: why bother.
Oh, and by the way, the same mechanism can certainly not be used to filter WP for children... Imagine a 15-year old boy reading, let's say, [[Autofellatio]], and there's a link saying "Don't click when you are not allowed to see adult content, please"...
Eugene