On 6/7/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/7/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
You should see the crap people have tried to pull with IAR. Would I be right in guessing off the tp of my head that the people trying to make "be bold" more timid have previously failed to add subclauses and riders to IAR?
Nah be bold has always been a lot more timid than certain people appear to think (hasn't mattered for the most part since most people only edit articles).
Subclauses on IAR are irrelevant since there should never be any need to cite IAR.
Huh? Then why do we have IAR in the first place? Citing it is terribly useful when confronted with people who follow policies to the letter without using their good judgment.
Johnleemk