On 12/12/06, Michael Smith runedchozo@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
Yesterday, I reported Itaqallah for blatantly falsifying his edit summaries:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad_as_a_diplomat&diff=93...
Summary was "rv unsourced OR" despite the fact that I included the source very directly: See Also: [[Conquest of Mecca]] Source: Prophet's biography by Ibn Hisham, p 802ff; Al-Waqidi, p319ff; Ibn Sa'ad, p96ff
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad_as_a_diplomat&diff=93... Edit summary claims it has been "extensively discussed" on the talk page, no such discussion existed.
Nobody has yet even bothered to deal with this. Instead, Itaqallah got an admin friend of his to lock the article page, got another member of his Muslim Guild to block me, and then I come in today and ANOTHER of his lying friends has falsely accused me of sockpuppeting while I was gone and they've jacked the illegal block all the way to five days now.
Runedchozo _
Actually, your edit summaries amount to violation of NPA, which is blockable.