Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
Process versus policy. Policy states we can't have articles on unverifiable subjects written in biased terms. Process in this case would, if applied legalistically, impede the inevitable and desirable. Standard disclaimers apply, but I don't see a problem here.
I'm with you. But process AND policy and whatever else don't let you just junk an article based on sourcing alone, as sourcing could be found. Part of that five day thing, etc.
You'll never see me complain about losing an article because sources weren't found for it (although I have my opinions on reliable sources in general), but I will complain if a simple effort can't be made.
-Jeff