I'm aware of this page, marked as "currently inactive and is retained primarily for historical interest" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:STABLE
But, this isn't the same thing as the idea to be tried someday on dewiki and maybe enwiki, to delay anon. edits from going live. I found some pages that describe such ideas on meta wiki, but not sure which ideas actually are or might be pursued. Or if dewiki decided there was no consensus for it?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2006_proposed_approval_for_anonymous_edits http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications_subcommittees/2006/09/02_DE_ar... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Timed_article_change_stabilisation_me... http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Article_validation - some other ideas
-Aude
On 3/8/07, Jeff Raymond jeff.raymond@internationalhouseofbacon.com wrote:
Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:21:34 -0800, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
There was a pretty strong consensus against stable versions when it was first pushed last fall. I'm not sure if that consensus still exists (I'm strongly opposed to the concept myself), but it's worth noting.
I don't remember any such consensus against it.
Neither do I.
I recall it rather strongly, actually. It was around the same time we were preoccupied with the Elephant vandalism, and Cyde was the main guy saying let's do it anyway.
-Jeff
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l