I'd be fine with that if a "general" statement was placed for everybody and not just children. Children are not under any greater risk than adults from internet predators. - White Cat
On 6/9/07, michael west michawest@gmail.com wrote:
Without this going on (ad infinitum) my proposal was just a new section in the welcome message explaining about how to use your identity. It has already been pointed out that nobodies identity is very safe anyway, but as herod said "washed my hands". If wikipedians do wanna go beyond the mile to explain to kids just be aware that you could come into the same critism as a ped. Its difficult. much in favor of a complete ban of age and area. we are not myspace
On 09/06/07, White Cat wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have children and even if had children it would be my duty as
their
parent to do whats best for them, not because of some 'silly' wikipedia policy.
- White Cat
On 6/9/07, Sean Barrett sean@epoptic.com wrote:
White Cat stated for the record:
We are wikipedia editors, we are not guardian angels of any sort. It
is
nice
you are feeling responsible, please be responsible and do not force
this
responsibility on people who do not desire it and have other things
to
do,
such as writing an encyclopedia or in my case merely reading it. - White Cat
I wouldn't dream of forcing you to be responsible for your children, especially when you have so many more important things to do.
-- Sean Barrett | Ceci n'est pas une citation. sean@epoptic.com |
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l