I was looking for precedents for sanctioning creative disruption (as described in [[WP:TROLL]]). But didn't find any at: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration policy/Precedents]].
What if an editor does the following for a couple of months: * removing all mesages from their talk page (and all the talk pages of his user pages) * creating user subpages about alleged misbehavior of his "enemies", giving them "hypcorisy awards", accusing them of being members of a cabal, etc. * [[WP:POINT]], marking pages, categories for deletion in retaliation * [[WP:TROLL]] (marking articles of his arch-enemy as stubs en masse, starting stupid votes on policy changes, being a pain in the neck at the village pump (but carefully)) * Adding provocative (but not necessarily very rude) comments in article discussions and edit summaries * Retaliative voting against anything the people on his hit list support * Rallying troops on internet forums for a "freedom fight" in Wikipedia to push a particular POV
So if a user learns to do all this without violating the "hard" policies like [[WP:NPA]] and [[WP:3RR]] too much, can he go on forever?
Can anyone point me to the closest precedent to this behavior and what happened to such creative trolls?
Thanks, nyenyec