Ray Saintonge wrote:
The Cunctator wrote:
On 12/8/06, Daniel P. B. Smith wikipedia2006@dpbsmith.com wrote:
If the episode has _not_ been published on commercial videos, then IMHO it is not verifiable. Of course, published print sources that describe the episode are fine.
Of course it's verifiable. Verifiable means "able to be verified", not "commercially available."
Absolutely. The person citing the episode may have taped it when it was broadcast. That's certainly legal when someone is time shifting. If the episode has not yet been made commercially available, I'm sure that the producers still have the episode in their archives somewhere.
You haven't read the lede of [[Doctor Who missing episodes]] then.