Sheldon Rampton wrote:
I call on Jimbo to make sure that Ed doesn't abuse his powers to inject his own minority point of view into an article about which he clearly feels very passionate while lacking sufficient knowledge or perspective to serve as any kind of arbiter of what constitutes fairness and balance.
Well, sure, but keep in mind that I'm essentially sympathetic to what Ed is saying. I think that there is a lot of politically driven junk science in this area, unskeptically reported by people who like the political implications, and that a skeptical voice about that is healthy.
But content is not my job, procedure is.
And of course, as I've said, it would be inappropriate to ban people without due process, and I tend to suspect that this case if studied carefully would reveal the healthy debate that gives rise to NPOV rather than any actual bannable offenses.
--Jimbo