No, your right to insert the Daniel Pipes POV is removed. That ruling makes no attempt to affect the right of other users to address Pipes's viewpoints. Just you.
-Snowspinner
On Nov 28, 2004, at 11:41 AM, Harry Smith wrote:
This does not appear to the be only case of POV censoring by ArbCom see the WP:RFAR vs Lance6Wins.
The Daniel Pipes POV is also censored.
Lance6Wins
--- Phil Sandifer sandifer@sbcglobal.net wrote:
I'm seriously concerned about a recent arbcom enforcement. A ban was ordered against [[User:C Colden]] as per the ruling in the case of Lyndon LaRouche.
C Colden was not a Wikipedia user when the LaRouche ruling was made. He was not a party to that case. However, the ruling of the case, apparently, was a ruling against the insertion of "original research originating with the LaRouche movement" (Which seems to be an interchangable phrase with "the LaRouche point of view") into any article by any user.
This seems to me to reflect a hard arbcom ruling that the LaRouche POV is not something that need be included under the Wikipedia NPOV policy. As loathesome as I find the LaRouche movement to be, I am seriously troubled by the notion that the arbcom can and will make blanket rulings that certain perspectives are not part of NPOV.
-Snowspinner
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l