Guettarda wrote:
At WP:ATT he has said the the issue was not the use of primary sources, but the generation of novel conclusions based on the sources. Of course, that totally contradicts his original posting, where he says that the material should not be reintroduced unless it is supported by secondary sources.
That is not a contradiction at all. If you can produce a source which tells us that this obscure lawsuit was important, and which echoes your original research and analysis into what happened, then re-insert it with appropriate sourcing. In the meantime the reliance on your own original historical research is problematic, and you should not reintroduce it until you have a secondary source.
--Jimbo