On 8/30/06, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/30/06, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
That's no less of a insincere statment than it was the first time Jimbo decided to restrict editing and call it becoming more open.
Jimbo did? Really. Jimbo really gets around.
Did what? You deny he's restricted editing in the past, or that he called it becoming more open?
Non-logged in editors are not anonymous. In fact, the only way to effectively be anonymous is to create an account for every edit and log in.
Technically, the word anonymous means without a name.
So a user who logs in as "88 dot 33 dot 23 dot 23" is anonymous?