Bryan Derksen said:
If the Wollmann article gets undeleted, NPOV policy would demand that the sort of caveats you just listed off about Wollmann's notoriety should be mentioned in there. If NPOV is done right then all sides of an argument should theoretically be satisfied with the results.
Oh yes, I agree. I think the article when it was deleted was admirably NPOV. I did that myself. I was still relieved to see it go.