Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
In all of the other wikis (except for the ones modeled after us), there is no "supreme-dictator-for-life" (as you put it, perhaps humorsly, in a previous post).
I don't think I ever said that, but if I did, I want to make sure to dispel the notion that I think such a thing would be appropriate.
I'm the servant of wikipedia, not the master.
On many of the About, FAQ, and similar pages, you state that Wikipedia is an anarchy, but that really is not true.
I also don't think Wikipedia is an anarchy.
--Jimbo