On 6/23/06, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/24/06, maru dubshinki marudubshinki@gmail.com wrote:
There's plenty of common ground- this is an immediatist/eventualist split, after all, and we all know that one day the Immediate moment will have become the eventual. (In other words, as time passes and articles improve, this issue will become less and less important until it only makes sense in rare individual articles).
Uh, is it not true that the number of bad articles is growing faster than the number of good articles? I'd always taken that as a given, based on our still rapid growth in sheer number of articles.
Also, I'm just generally not comfortable with the situation that the Foundation Office wants things one way, but everyone else seems to want them another way (and everyone else is winning)...
Steve
Yeah, but our growth in articles is also slowing down from the exponential growth rates we'd previously enjoyed (or so my tea-leaf reading of the statistics would indicate).
As for your second point, so what? The Foundation Office exists for the sake of the "everyone else", not the other way around.
~maru