Ken when you read one paragraph from a source, and then summarize it, you are making a decision as an editor of exactly how to summarize the source aren't you? So in the same way, when you read a book, and represent it in two paragraphs in an article on "Chicago" or whatever, you are choosing what to include, exclude, how to whittle it down to a sparse representation of that source.
You are making these decisions, and they are part-and-parcel of "editing" they are not "original research" because you are not *creating* new "statements-of-fact". Instead you are summarizing other people's statements into a much smaller space.
That isn't the same thing is it? It would only be the same, if your summary *does not actually represent* the source.
Will Johnson
**************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination. Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out! (http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000001)