In a message dated 10/28/2008 2:35:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time, snowspinner@gmail.com writes:
"I want to take away the right for an editor to revert an edit for the sole reason that we can't verify the person's identity so what they say doesn't count. I want to mandate actually looking at the sources, thinking about the issue, and making a decision based on something other than "The rules say X, period.">>
----------------- This has absolutely nothing to do with what occurred. What occurred was that the subject of the BLP made claims and this entire thread is about whether we can alter an article based on the subject of the BLP making claims without our ability to identify whether that person is actually who they claim to be.
That is all it's about. It's not about any thing else. **************Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your favorites, no registration required and great graphics – check it out! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir= http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001)