Nicholas Knight wrote:
I continue to see no usefulness in it, and the "why not" is because people _will not use wikipedia_, and quite likely, existing editors would leave. I certainly would if this became an accepted part of Wikipedia. It would be a final demonstration that the people here are not the least bit interested in constructing a useful educational resource, but seek only to shove a social agenda down other's throats.
Now you've really lost me. Who seeks "only to shove a social agenda down other's [sic] throats"? What social agenda do you mean? This isn't some kind of moral objection to the act of autofellatio, is it?
-- Chad