On 20/10/2007, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
Durova has blocked Cla68 for 24 hours for responding to Jimbo's posting on [[Talk:Gary Weiss]], which included "No nonsense, zero tolerance, shoot on sight.", with "Most of us usually try to give some reasoning for any action, proposed action, or threatened action that we discuss on an article's talk page. Would you mind doing the same?" It was claimed that this was a "WP:POINT" violation. Just how is asking the reasons behind a draconian statement a block-worthy violation?
Looks a little unfair to me, too. A lot of people seem to miss the "disrupting Wikipedia" part of "disrupting Wikipedia to make a point". Just making a point is NOT a policy violation. Posting to a talk page is not disruptive.