From: wikien-l-bounces@Wikipedia.org [mailto:wikien-l-bounces@Wikipedia.org] On Behalf Of Nick Boalch Peter Mackay wrote:
Obviously writing an NPOV-compliant article isn't a
problem. Unduly
biasing an article towards your own opinions is not compliant with NPOV.
I don't think you understand NPOV. NPOV allows for multiple
points of
view, not one. We present the facts and let the reader decide.
I can assure you that I understand NPOV perfectly.
I will reiterate: unduly biasing an article towards your own opinions is not compliant with NPOV.
I wasn't talking about biasing articles. That's something you brought in, and I'll agree with your motherhood strawman: unduly biasing an article towards your own opinions is not compliant with NPOV.
What I'm saying - again - is that it's fine to have editors putting their own partisan opinions into articles so long as this is done in accordance with NPOV. NPOV allows for multiple viewpoints.
I think we've both reached agreement on all the above points and we can let the list get on with discussing other trivia?
Pete, anxious to see a 3-armed Wookie