I'm not sure we want to create a list of targets. Also as people who have inserted private information or libelous material are likely to do it again at the same place we are creating a security hole.
Fred
On Jun 21, 2006, at 6:20 AM, Phil Boswell wrote:
Theresa Knott wrote:
On 6/21/06, Mark Ryan ultrablue@gmail.com wrote:
We appear to have lose access to the Oversight logs altogether. Is there any explanation for this at all? I presume without this slight accountability measure in place the oversight privileges have also been revoked from those who have them.
Originally the log only showed who had removed an edit and where it was removed from. It did not show what was removed so it was not that good for accountability at all. It has now been changes so that it shows the edit that was deleted. This is much better for accountability because we can check up on each other. Unfortunately this means that the log itself has to be kept private. Those people with oversight can view it. No one else can.
Then the logical step would be to reproduce the original limited version of the log for those without oversight access, surely?
HTH HAND
Phil
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Oversight-log- t1822394.html#a4973157 Sent from the English Wikipedia forum at Nabble.com.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l