On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, K P wrote:
Can someone please link directly to a current Wikipedia article, that should be changed, and list a proper reference to it that is not being used, to show the damage being done by this fracas to Wikipedia? Just one example of a specific article, and what should be in it, according to a highly reliable source--not a dozen, just one.
Like the generalized attack sites version, the harm caused by this is mostly in the discussion pages, not in the article pages. I hope you are not claiming that unless it's directly deleted from an article page, it isn't damage.